The same leaderboard’s number two, traced: a real gain, a third of the board
The same leaderboard reel put a second name at two hundred and thirteen thousand dollars. That name is an AI trading agent with two public wallets. The exchange account has never placed a trade. The Solana wallet has genuinely made about sixty-five thousand dollars, on a wallet that was three weeks old when we looked. The agent’s own dashboard said eleven thousand. Three numbers for one trader, and the only one anyone can check is the chain. So: a real gain, at about a third of what the board showed. The app does not say how it computes the board.
The same affiliate reel that put favel at number one showed omotrades second on the app’s “Top PNL” board at +$213,377.11. The app’s public username lookup lists two wallets for the handle. The exchange account behind the EVM wallet has never traded: every sample of its account-value history is zero. The Solana wallet is real and up: realized +$40,600, unrealized +$24,700, a total of +$65,300 with $143,600 in it, on a wallet that was twenty-three days old when we read it. A third number exists too: omotrades is an AI trading agent with its own public dashboard, which showed +$11,400 all-time on the same day. Three figures for one trader, from the app, the chain and the trader, and none of them agree. The chain is the one anyone can check. This trader made money. The board’s number is not the amount, and the app does not say how the board is computed.
Wallets, as listed by the app’s public username lookup: Solana HxwmEH84o3EuezCUZuBEEeKT6uMDv8R4VRi76ExB87St and EVM 0xc7339cd3b13ebf8a1cd94153421c0e63faa602b6, both linked from the receipt below. Exchange account (Hyperliquid, read from its public records on 8 September): 11 account-value samples, all zero, no fills, no volume. Solana wallet (Birdeye wallet analyzer, read by a person on 2 September): realized +$40,600, unrealized +$24,700, total +$65,300, $143,600 in the wallet, wallet age 23 days; trade count and win rate were not recorded in that read and are not stated here. Self-reported: the trader’s own dashboard read +$11,400 all-time on 2 September. Ethereum: 0 token transfers. Base: the public explorer’s counter said 0 while its transfer list showed a row, so Base is unquantified and counted as nothing, which favours the claim. Best case = every gain in either wallet counted and every loss ignored: $65,300 against a board figure of $213,377.11, a shortfall of $148,077. The app does not publish its leaderboard method; the handle-to-wallet mapping is the app’s own; the Solana read predates the exchange read by six days.
- Kill date
- 2026-09-08
- Sample
- 2 wallets, 11 exchange samples, a 23-day-old Solana wallet
- Method
- Documented kill
- Verdict
- a third of the board
omotrades: +$213,377.11 on the board, $65,300 in the wallets
Seen 2026-08-29 in an affiliate reel on Instagram, on a leaderboard titled “TOP PNL”. The handle became wallets through the app's own public username lookup, which lists these two wallets for the handle. Every figure below is a stored input; the verdict is one rule over them, stated at the end.
No activity, ever: 11 account-value samples from 2026-08-09 to 2026-09-08, all zero. No fills, no volume. Nothing to draw.
- account value on 2026-09-08
- $0.00
- all-time result
- +$0.00
- fills
- none
- notional traded
- $0
- builder fees paid to the app
- $0.00
- samples in the history
- 11
explorer: hypurrscan →
- realized
- +$40,600
- unrealized
- +$24,700
- all-time
- +$65,300
- wallet age at the read
- 23 days
- left in the wallet
- $143,600
- all-time, as published by the trader
- +$11,400
- Ethereum
- 0 token transfers
- Base
- the public explorer's counter said 0 while its transfer list showed a row, so Base is unquantified and counted as nothing here
Best case for the claim: every gain in either wallet counted, every loss ignored, Base counted as nothing. That comes to $65,300 against a board figure of +$213,377.11. That is 31% of the board: a real gain, and a board figure about 3.3 times anything on the chain.
We are not saying omotrades lied, or lost: the wallet is up. The board's figure is the app's, an affiliate filmed it, and the app does not say how it is computed. We are saying the board's number is about three times anything on the chain.
- The Solana figures were read by a person from the analyzer's page on 2 September, not pulled by API, and that read did not record a trade count or win rate, so none is stated. A recorded API body will replace it when a key exists.
- The Solana read is six days older than the exchange read. The wallet was 23 days old at the read, so all-time here means three weeks.
- The exchange account has never traded: 11 samples, all zero. There is nothing to draw.
- The handle-to-wallet mapping is the app's. If the app lists the wrong wallets for the handle, everything on this page is about someone else's wallets, and the board's figure is still unverifiable.
- The app does not publish how its leaderboard is computed. The trader's own dashboard is a third, self-reported number and is shown as such.
- Base activity may exist and is unquantified; it is counted as zero in the best case, which favours the claim.
- The copy-trading leaderboard’s number one, traced to the wallets behind the handle+$814,776 → $0 · 2026-09-04
- Buy the dip, counted: thirteen thousand opportunities, priced+65% vs +166% · 2026-09-01
- The exit-learning loop, run at maximum effort until every survivor confessed27 agents, 0 survivors · 2026-09-01
Tested on the record and published in full, with the real numbers, whatever the result.
See all kills